Female Historians and Knowledge Production for Women’s Studies: The Nigerian Example Since 1974
Abstract
Knowledge production is fundamental to the development of African history. Professor Bolanle Awe (a foremost Nigerian female historian) once affirmed that: „„socio-economic conditions of African universities are not conducive to the production of knowledge, hence US and European scholars publish more about Africans than do African scholars‟‟. It is based on this conviction that she engaged the process that African women should be studied in their own terms. Several scholarly works of female historians on women has been purpose driven. Bolanle Awe, Nina Mba and La Ray Denzer are the most prominent female historians that located the directions of research on African women. They institutionalised African women‟s historical studies in spite of the difficulties encountered in presenting and promoting its scholarship. This paper examines the forms of knowledge production that evolved from these women and other female historians across Africa and the Diaspora. Furthermore, it investigates how the knowledge produced was institutionalised. It also explains the multi disciplinary nature of the knowledge forms produced. The methodology adopted here is a content analysis of books, journals and academic biographies and/or autobiographies.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/ijgws.v6n1a3
Abstract
Knowledge production is fundamental to the development of African history. Professor Bolanle Awe (a foremost Nigerian female historian) once affirmed that: „„socio-economic conditions of African universities are not conducive to the production of knowledge, hence US and European scholars publish more about Africans than do African scholars‟‟. It is based on this conviction that she engaged the process that African women should be studied in their own terms. Several scholarly works of female historians on women has been purpose driven. Bolanle Awe, Nina Mba and La Ray Denzer are the most prominent female historians that located the directions of research on African women. They institutionalised African women‟s historical studies in spite of the difficulties encountered in presenting and promoting its scholarship. This paper examines the forms of knowledge production that evolved from these women and other female historians across Africa and the Diaspora. Furthermore, it investigates how the knowledge produced was institutionalised. It also explains the multi disciplinary nature of the knowledge forms produced. The methodology adopted here is a content analysis of books, journals and academic biographies and/or autobiographies.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/ijgws.v6n1a3
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
Today | 196 |
Yesterday | 217 |
This Month | 4617 |
Last Month | 5893 |
All Days | 2204457 |
Online | 20 |