Mismatch between Interventionists’ Messages and Local Reality of Female Genital Cutting in a Kurya Society - Northern Tanzania
Abstract
Female genital cutting viewed as harmful, painful and traumatic practice experienced by girls and women; is also regarded as gender violent practice against women and girl child. Regardless of global and national efforts to end it, the practice has been highly celebrated amongst Kurya people in Tarime district-northern Tanzania, accounting for 85%. Focusing on how interventionists’ messages are delivered and perceived in a Kurya society, the author addresses the question of why interventions seem not to succeed at the local context. The article reveals “a dialogue of the deaf”. While the local people cannot make sense of the messages from the agents of social change and thus continue to reproduce the practice on the ground of cultural significance attached to the procedure, the latter does not take into account the local discourse when constructing intervention strategies and messages. The author shed light on the importance of understanding locally constructed meanings and beliefs through which the practice is maintained and argues that it is the interventionists who ought to be educated first about indigenous knowledge and experiences before embarking in processes of supposedly educating local people in their own local reality.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/ijgws.v4n2a6
Abstract
Female genital cutting viewed as harmful, painful and traumatic practice experienced by girls and women; is also regarded as gender violent practice against women and girl child. Regardless of global and national efforts to end it, the practice has been highly celebrated amongst Kurya people in Tarime district-northern Tanzania, accounting for 85%. Focusing on how interventionists’ messages are delivered and perceived in a Kurya society, the author addresses the question of why interventions seem not to succeed at the local context. The article reveals “a dialogue of the deaf”. While the local people cannot make sense of the messages from the agents of social change and thus continue to reproduce the practice on the ground of cultural significance attached to the procedure, the latter does not take into account the local discourse when constructing intervention strategies and messages. The author shed light on the importance of understanding locally constructed meanings and beliefs through which the practice is maintained and argues that it is the interventionists who ought to be educated first about indigenous knowledge and experiences before embarking in processes of supposedly educating local people in their own local reality.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/ijgws.v4n2a6
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
![]() |
209 |
![]() |
545 |
![]() |
1071 |
![]() |
9586 |
![]() |
2244215 |
![]() |
26 |